Well, we’re still in lockdown and I’ve spent the last week redecorating my computer room. I also took the chance to read about using flash with bird photography, especially with respect to fill flash. So the object was to use natural light for the main exposure and flash to help remove some of the shadows and add a catch light. I used a Better Beamer on a Canon 430EXII flash, attached to the hot shoe of a Canon 7DmkII with a Canon 500L mk1 lens. I would have preferred to get the flash off camera to reduce the ‘steel eye’ (animal equivalent of red eye) but it wasn’t possible. Camera set to Av and iso400. The light wasn’t that good, so the aperture was at f4.0 to get a reasonable shutter speed. Flash was set to high speed and 1/32 power. This allowed for multiple shots because the flash could recycle very quickly. So here are some of the shots I managed. Only a couple of them had ‘steel eye’ which required a bit of photoshop. So the question is, was it worth it?
The real question is what do they look like compared to not using the flash.
So here are a couple of shots taken 2 seconds apart and processed in Lightroom and Photoshop using the same settings
Other than giving a catchlight and a bit more detail in the shadows, there doesn’t appear to be a great difference. Personally, I’m happy with that as less is more. Too big a change would probably look false and not natural, which is the look I want.